I do not visit often to these inane chat sights but seeing my address I thought I would chime in. If either of you or any others really think their observations can have any material importance you are only fooling yourself. Your perceived self importance is laughable. If most would spend more time with beneficial due diligence such as reviewing all the very public and available filings, the fully audited financial reports, and the fully disclosed conference calls you might find that you do not need the suspect information both pro and con found here. QUIK has been, currently is and will continue to be a highly speculative investment. The only thing any of us can control is how we aggregate the risk within our very personal portfolios. Most if not all thinly floated low price speculations are subject to great volatility. QUIK's recent volatility is more a result of hype and a fairly popular investment advisory publication that featured the co as a buy recommendation. The co will have a chance at overcoming the hype if they can deliver on their business model. There is no doubt they have interesting technology but the risks that the technology will remain relevant and that they can deliver it in quantity remain elevated. Over the next 3-4 quarters it will become obvious as to the adoption or rejection of the Co.'s technology and whether they have a durable business model or not.

As thin as these shares are any interim successes with any OEM will stimulate trading and conversely if the ensuing conference calls are mostly about potential then the shares will likely follow the path of the majority of speculative investments - lower. Simple math. Personally watching shares of SAM, BNI, TRV, SWK and GS improve portfolio values is just as rewarding as waiting for a late inning home-run from the likes of QUIK.