The execs have changed the change in control definition in their benefit recovery plan from a majority BOD shift to a shift in shareholder percentage. Their plan recoups all the benefits lost from the plan freeze a year ago plus a change in control increases their age, service and locks in vesting. It's pretty much a huge windfall for anyone who gets it. While I do think this is what the definition should have always been, why change it now? GY mgmt is notorious for watching their own back. Perhaps a buyout looms?