>>You may have a valid concern, I don't know as I am NOT a financial analyst. I have never recommended stocks of any kind, I don't make estimates on share prices and I don't track who owns how many shares of what. I don't mean to sound rude, but I don't care. I'm don't work for a hedge fund, am not an investor and don't work in the financial sector. I give out information based on what I hear from customers. How people use that info is up to them. At no time have I said or implied that someone should buy or not buy any stock.<<

So you give out information based on what you hear from customers [such as Akamai's customers] . . . but you don't breathe a word of what you learned from Akamai itself in its investigation of your problem with Akamai's webcast? You place more reliance on hearsay than on first-person experience?

>>So if you have a problem with financial analysts and institutions, fine by me. But has nothing to do with me and comparing what I do, to what they do, isn't relevant. You're implying that the data they give is out is for their best interest so that they can make money on the stock and that may be the case. But the data I give out I don't make money from. I don't own shares, don't recommend stocks and don't make anything if the stock goes up or down. I don't even track the stock prices of these companies other than looking at the every so often.<<

Yes, you've said that countless times and newsaboutstocks echoed you. However, as other board members here have said to you, there is more than one way to make money on what one conveys to the public. One of Jim Cramer's ruse lessons became infamous. You also receive gifts from companies. I remember one of your posts in which you told them what not to send you and what to send you instead.

Anyway, I appreciate your not disagreeing with the other things I wrote in my two posts to you yesterday.